Verified Document

Learning Clinical Interview Revision How Interview

If teachers fail to design connected scaffolds than the class will develop only limited capabilities. He explains that this can be done by choosing only those scaffolding tools which have similar structures, assignment objectives, and interactive styles (Tabak, 2004). Hence when considering the scaffolds for developing skills of weak students, I will make sure that the scaffolds are complementing not only the main learning objective but also one another.

References

Biehler, S.M. (2010). Psychology Applied to Teaching: 12th edition. Wadsworth Publishing.

Bilal, D. (2002). Perspectives on children's navigation of the World Wide Web: Does the type of search task make a difference? Online Information Review, 26(2), 108-127.

Cho, K. & Jonassen, DH (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technological Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22.

Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches & issues. Cambridge, M.A.: Brookline Books, Inc.

(2002). New directions for library service to young adults. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
Nussbaum, M. (2002). The process of becoming a participant in small-group critical discussions: A case study. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45, 488-498.

Puntambekar, S. & Kolodner, J.L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185-217.

Rogers, D & Swan K. (2004). Self-Regulated Learning and Internet Searching. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1804-1824.

Tabak, I. (2004). Synergy: A complement to emerging patterns of distributed scaffolding. The journal of The Learning Sciences, 13(3), 305-335.

Toth, E.E. (2000, August). Representational scaffolding during scientific inquiry: Interpretive and expressive use of inscriptions in classroom learning. In Gleitman L.R. & Joshi, A.K. (Eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 953-958). Mahvah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Sources used in this document:
References

Biehler, S.M. (2010). Psychology Applied to Teaching: 12th edition. Wadsworth Publishing.

Bilal, D. (2002). Perspectives on children's navigation of the World Wide Web: Does the type of search task make a difference? Online Information Review, 26(2), 108-127.

Cho, K. & Jonassen, DH (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technological Research and Development, 50(3), 5-22.

Hogan, K., & Pressley, M. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches & issues. Cambridge, M.A.: Brookline Books, Inc.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now